Reliability of simulator driving tool for evaluation of sleepiness, fatigue and driving performance.

D. Davenne, R. Lericollais, P. Sagaspe, J. Taillard, A. Gauthier, S. Espié, P. Philip
Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2012-03-01; 45: 677-682
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.09.046

PubMed
Read on PubMed



1. Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Mar;45:677-82. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.09.046. Epub 2011
Nov 17.

Reliability of simulator driving tool for evaluation of sleepiness, fatigue and
driving performance.

Davenne D(1), Lericollais R, Sagaspe P, Taillard J, Gauthier A, Espié S, Philip
P.

Author information:
(1)INSERM, ER I27, F-14000 Caen, France.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the impact of extended wakefulness (i.e., sleepiness)
and prolonged driving (i.e., fatigue) at the wheel in simulated versus real-life
driving conditions.
DESIGN: Participants drove on an INRETS-MSIS SIM2 simulator in a research
laboratory or an open French highway during 3 nocturnal driving sessions. A
dose-response design of duration of nocturnal driving was used: a 2 h short
driving session (3-5 AM), a 4 h intermediate driving session (1-5 AM) and an 8 h
long driving session (9 PM-5 AM).
PARTICIPANTS: Two groups of healthy male drivers (20 for simulated driving and 14
drivers for real driving; mean age±SD=22.3±1.6 years), free of sleep disorders.
MEASUREMENTS: Number of inappropriate line crossings, self-rated fatigue and
sleepiness were recorded in the last hour of driving sessions to control the
effects of prior waking time and time of day.
RESULTS: Compared to the daytime reference session, both simulated and real
driving performance were affected by a short nocturnal driving session (P

Know more about